Supreme Court acquitted two policemen in 1979 rape case. CJI Gavai called it a judicial embarrassment. Subsequently, laws were changed, the definition of consent was redefined, and women's rights were strengthened.
New Delhi: The Supreme Court's verdict in the 1979 rape case remained controversial for a long time. In that case, an tribal girl was allegedly raped in a police station. The Supreme Court acquitted two policemen at the time, stating that the relationship was consensual and there were no injury marks on the girl's body. This decision disappointed people and raised questions about the justice system.
Statement by CJI B.R. Gavai
Chief Justice Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai described this case as a moment of institutional embarrassment. He stated that the court's decision failed to uphold the dignity of the judicial system. The CJI acknowledged that this decision was a turning point for the country. It led to public and women's organizations launching movements for women's rights.
Changes in Law
CJI Gavai explained that the 1979 verdict exposed the shortcomings of criminal law. Following this decision, the concept of consent was redefined, and legal protections in custodial rape cases were strengthened. He added that subsequently, several laws were introduced for gender justice, and courts reinforced gender equality through numerous judgments.
Improvement in Women's Constitutional Status
Following the 1979 verdict, legal changes helped women overcome inherent inequalities in family and customs. Steps were taken to bring women to the forefront of constitutional citizenship. The CJI also stated that the verdict contributed to strengthening women's safety and rights in society.
