Congress demands a special Parliament session on Operation Sindoor and the ceasefire, but lacks opposition support, leaving the party isolated.
Operation Sindoor: Amidst Operation Sindoor, the ongoing operation against Pakistan-based terrorist camps, the ceasefire decision has sparked a new debate in Parliament. Congress demanded a special session to discuss the issue. Rahul Gandhi, Mallikarjun Kharge, and Jairam Ramesh wrote to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, urging a discussion, stating it's a crucial national security matter demanding open parliamentary debate.
However, a significant disagreement within the opposition has emerged regarding Congress's demand. Prominent opposition leaders like Sharad Pawar, Mamata Banerjee, and Akhilesh Yadav oppose a special session, arguing that the sensitive nature of national security renders parliamentary debate inappropriate.
Congress questions the ceasefire and US President Trump's claims
Congress leaders are questioning US President Donald Trump's claim of a ceasefire with Pakistan. They asked the Prime Minister whether Trump's assertion is accurate, criticizing the government's lack of response, deeming it detrimental to the nation's interests. This fuels their demand for a special parliamentary session.
Sharad Pawar's opposition: Why shouldn't there be a discussion?
Sharad Pawar stated that open parliamentary discussion on national security issues is inappropriate. He emphasized maintaining confidentiality regarding such sensitive information, arguing public disclosure could jeopardize national security. He suggested a meeting of all parties to gather opinions without compromising sensitive details.
Opposition pressure and Congress's isolation
The situation presents a significant challenge for Congress, as opposition parties like the Samajwadi Party and Trinamool Congress (TMC) are not united on this issue. Electoral pressures appear to be driving a wedge between them and Congress. Both parties are hesitant to express clear opinions, mindful of upcoming state assembly elections.
Tejashwi Yadav and CPI's support
RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav supported the demand for a parliamentary session, urging the Prime Minister to convene one to provide detailed information about the Pulwama terror attack and the ceasefire. The CPI also supported the demand, but Congress lacks broader opposition backing.
Impact of a parliamentary debate on national security?
Sharad Pawar and other leaders believe a parliamentary debate on national security would be unproductive. They contend that publicly discussing such matters could endanger the nation's security. Instead, they advocate for an all-party meeting to discuss the issue and obtain necessary information from the government.
