A lavish parade in Washington D.C. marked Donald Trump's 79th birthday and the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary, but sparked widespread "No Kings" protests, with citizens deeming it a wasteful expenditure of taxpayer funds.
Trump Protests: June 14th witnessed a stark contrast in the United States: jubilant celebrations alongside widespread street protests. The day marked former President Donald Trump's 79th birthday and the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army's founding. A grand military parade in Washington D.C. was held to commemorate both occasions, featuring thousands of troops, tanks, armored vehicles, and fighter jets. However, the reported cost of approximately ₹350 crore (approximately $42 million USD) ignited widespread discontent and protests across the nation.
Military Parade Fuels Anti-Trump Protests
Trump's opponents allege the parade's purpose extended beyond the Army's anniversary, serving primarily as a lavish birthday celebration for Trump. They characterized it as a wasteful use of taxpayer money and a display of authoritarianism. Critics argued that such military parades are unprecedented in American tradition, suggesting Trump sought to enhance his image through the event.
'No Kings' Protests Gain Momentum
Nationwide protests under the banner "No Kings" erupted against Trump, spearheaded by organizations like Indivisible.org. These demonstrations aimed to challenge Trump's policies, the ostentatious display of military power, and perceived threats to democracy. These protests took place in over 1500 cities and locations across the United States, involving hundreds of ordinary citizens and several Hollywood celebrities.
Hollywood Stars Join the Protests
Trump's policies, particularly his immigration policies, human rights record, and centralization of power, have long faced criticism. Numerous film personalities participated in the protests against Trump's birthday celebration and the military parade. They argued that such displays of power are antithetical to democracy and indicative of authoritarian tendencies.
Government's Argument: Celebrating the Army's 250th Anniversary
The U.S. administration maintains the parade was solely part of the Army's 250th-anniversary commemoration, unrelated to Trump's birthday. However, critics contend the parade's timing and grandeur were deliberately linked to Trump's birthday to provide him with political leverage.
Security Measures and Expenditure Questioned
The event involved extensive security measures. The U.S. Secret Service deployed anti-scale fencing over 18 miles to prevent any undesirable activities. While the parade remained violence-free, the heavy security and expenditure exceeding ₹350 crore (approximately $42 million USD) fueled public outrage.
Political Polarization at its Peak
The United States currently experiences extreme political polarization. Trump supporters view the parade as a symbol of national military strength and pride, while opponents see it as an abuse of power and a weakening of democratic institutions. This highlights how political discourse in the U.S. has transcended policy debates, encompassing personality cults and ideological clashes.
